Chủ Nhật, 8 tháng 1, 2017

Why is Times Global Insurance is better then Syska Gadget secure or Apps Daily for Mobile Insurance?

00:22 Posted by Unknown , , No comments
There are many reasons for this, the following are some typical reasons:
As we know, Times global is far better than any other insurance providers.
I have personal experience for both.
My father had an apps daily insurance for his Samsung Galaxy s6 edge. Upon an accidental fall, the glass screen broke down. I made a million calls to the customer care of apps daily to register my claim. Either the call would not get through, or if it does go through, their approval time period Is very long. I had to check back in a week later to get updates on my claim approval. As usual, the call didn't get through and with time my insurance expired. Eventually I had to sell off my broken cell phone at 1/6th its price.
I personally had a times insurance for my iPhone.I accidentally dropped my iPhone in water and obviously the display wasn't working well thereafter. I made a call to times global insurance customer service and without any hassle I received a perfectly working iphone back within 3 days.
It's hassle free
100% cashless
They do what they say
Very reliable and quick.
A few months later I started to again face issues with my touch. Without any hesitation I called them up again and yet again they stood by their commitment.
They have replaced my cell phone with another one which is perfectly fine.
I always recommend them to my friends. I also got the insurance for my mom and dad's cell phones from them!
They are actually doing a great job!

Besides, Times Global insurance is far far better then Syska gadget secure or appsdaily.
Times Global insurance has finest plans for mobile & laptop insurance in india. Times Global insurance has been rated no#1 constantly by several news surveys and other research reports. More then 45000 customers all across the globe and more then 28000 claims approved till now. Lowest depreciation in case of loss & theft. 100% cashless cover against all damages and malfunctions upto 50% refund on no claim as No claim bonus. 24 hours customer support and backend work. Global coverage, instant support while travelling abroad 
Fastest approval of claim settlement.
....India's largest online platform for Mobile & laptop insurance.....

Thứ Sáu, 6 tháng 1, 2017

The way for insurance companies to make money

22:54 Posted by Unknown , , No comments
there are many issues that we need to care about this matter:
First, what does an insurance company sell? 
  • Most of what is called "Life Insurance" are just tax-efficient savings products. You put money in more-or-less at will; the insurance company manages it for you (for a fee); you can take your money back whenever you want or at a given date.
    It is "insurance" in the sense that the company will guarantee the amount you can take back (for example in the form of a yearly increase on x%) and that the money will be available at the dates set in the contract.
  • Property and casualty insurance (P&C), but also Health insurance, promise to reimburse you for a damage you have suffered.
    For example, your car windows get broken, you go to the garage, have the windows replaced, you pay: that is the "damage". You file a claim with the insurance company sending copy of the invoice, and they give you the money back. (They might pay the garage directly too -- actual process will vary.)  Or the damage is the value of repairs for your house that burnt down.

    It is the same for Health, in a way: the insurance company pays the bills for you.

    The amount paid out by the insurance company might also include a deductible -- or they pay only a percentage of the total cost, etc.  Lots of variations exist, but the principle is the same.
  • Another part of Life Insurance works like P&C (which I why I discuss it only now): imagine you die tomorrow -- in a way, that would be a "damage" for your spouse and kids. So you can take an insurance contract that would pay out a set amount (say, USD 500 000) to cover the risk of death, or disability (or long illness), etc. 

Second, How does the business work (financially)?
I'll focus on the last two types of insurance. For the first type, we are basically talking about money management, which I will consider not "real" insurance.
You see from the above that the insurance company receives the money (the premiums) before it knows how much it will have to pay to whom.
Let's assume we talk about a company that writes contracts with yearly guarantees -- that is, the client pays premiums for coverage against any accident occurring over the next 12 months exactly. To simplify matters, I'll assume the premium is paid on 1-Jan -- but you can keep the same principles pro rata temporis for a fraction of a year.
We face two issues:
  • How soon will a claim on the contract be filled?
  • When will the payment be made? In case of several payments, how much and for how long?

This is where we introduce the Claims Ratio concept -- the ratio between claimsactually paid over the total premiums due (*), at a given time.
Insurance companies has historical data on the evolution of the Claims Ratio over time.
For example, of all contracts written in 1996, for total premiums received of €120 (vast majority in 1996 plus a few clients who only paid in 1997 after the company chased them):
  • €40 actually paid out in 1996 (33%)
  • €20 actually paid out in 1997 (50% cumulative)
  • €10 actually paid out in 1998 (58% cumulative)
  • €5 actually paid out in 1999 (63% cumulative)
  • €1 actually paid out in 2000 and 2001 -- nothing since (64% cumulative)

Thanks to a variety of statistical tools -- of which a simple average! -- insurance companies can figure out the best estimate for the sequence of pay-outs for the current year. It can also estimate the "ultimate" claims ratio for the current year. This is often called the Loss ratio.
Add the overhead / claims management costs (eg, the salary of the claims adjuster + heating of the company headquarters) and the total pay-out will typically be around 98% -- resulting in a margin of 2% for the company.
That's also the main technique to determine the price of a product / the premium to be paid by a client. Actuaries estimate the probable losses, then add estimated management costs and distribution costs (commissions to brokers and agents), and a bit of margin. Statistical models help tailor the premium to the specific risk (probability of having a damage, amount of the damage) of the client, of course.

On 31-Dec, the insurance company sets aside enough money to cover for all anticipated losses (sometimes with a prudence margin, ie, setting aside more than the best estimate) into an accounting reserve.  This amounts to the expected ultimate loss ratio multiplied by the total premiums due (eventually with a margin of prudence).
Then, year after year, the insurance companies compares the actual pay-out with the original expectation -- adjusting the accounting reserve up or down as needed. If the actual losses are below expectations (usually, below historical average), this creates profits. If not, it creates losses.
As noted above, a margin of 2% to 5% would be typical.
Another important aspect is that the insurance company will not let the money it collected as premium sleep in a 0%-interest bank account.  As noted above, some of the money will stay "in the coffers" less than one year, but a fraction will stay 5+ years.
So the insurance company invests this money in the financial markets -- mainly in governance and corporate bonds.  A whole expertise of Asset-Liability Management ensures that we appropriately "match" the timing of the in-flows and out-flows of money.
How the investment income is shared between the client and the insurance company will depend on the product itself and on local regulations. Most of the time, the investment income is taken into account for pricing the product -- that is, there is a slight discount vs. the "pure premium" so the client gets some benefits. But it really can vary a lot.
Finally, how does it work operationally? 
Insurance companies can be much more complex than it may seem. I won't go into the details, but i'll try to give you a flavor of the variety of things to do:
  • Marketing and product development -- we have to understand what our clients want and design the product including "features" and guarantees (eg, include dental or not in a health plan? Restrictions on prior illnesses? what kind of questionnaire do we ask the client to fill in?), the pricing, the regulatory constraints, etc. And IT, of course, for the systems to support this product.
  • Distribution -- How do we bring our products to client? Agents, brokers, direct sales channels all exist, plus the development of Internet sales and smartphone apps
  • Customer services and claims -- the "paper processes" including the customer changing address or phone number, the call center for the client who has a question, the people to review the files and pay the claims, etc. 
  • Finance -- Not only the usual financial planning and management (eg, to pay the bills), but also all the financial analysis to invest the money and generate a return, the computation of the reserves and accounting, etc.
  • Risk, Compliance and Regulations -- This includes investigation of fraudulent claims and anti-money-laundering, on top of all the accounting controls and risk management to ensure the company does not take on too much risk.
  • Usual support functions, IT, HR, etc.

The risks for insurers of owning an insurance broker

08:05 Posted by Unknown , , , No comments
In my opinion, this depends on the purpose of the acquisition. If they buy the brokerage as a quick way to acquire a sales force for their own products, they run the risk that the best salespeople will leave that brokerage in order to maintain independence.

If they bought it just because it's profitable and don't plan to make major changes, the risk wouldn't likely be greater than in any other venture capital acquisition.

Frankly, if all they wanted was to boost their sales force they don't need to go through the trouble of buying a brokerage - they would just need to work out a contract with them to sell their products and if those products are competitive then the brokerage will naturally end up selling them rather than others. This arrangement is cheaper than buying the firm out and flexible since the company can decide at any time to adjust commissions on new business or stop taking new business without the overhead of a bunch of career agents.

But in general, Mainly, concentration of distribution, anti-selection, anti-money laundering issues, customer protection.
Risks will, as usual, depend on the specifics of the situation. In the general case, I can think of (in no particular order):
Concentration of distribution -- It could happen that the insurance company becomes dependent on just a few distributors. Directly owning a broker could help diversify the distribution network -- but at the other extreme a company could become over-reliant on this one broker, resulting in increased risks (IT problem, data loss / data theft, reputation, changes in customer behaviors, etc.).
Anti-selection -- The broker will want to maximize its sales volumes, regardless of the "quality" of the underwriting (am exaggerating); the insurer will want to maintain claims levels low by selecting the risks it underwrites. From the insurer perspective, it must be able to provide the well-balanced incentives to the sales-force -- that's an art.
Anti-money laundering (AML) issues -- AML regulations vary by country, but the different actors (banks, distributors, insurers) have different responsibilities. So owning a brokerage firm means accepting more responsibilities for AML processes. High fines and even jail time are very much possible for the responsible officers.
Customer protection -- As Kapil Mehta says, a broker has a legal duty to act in the best interests of its clients, selecting the best product for the clients' needs  -- one of the major differences with an insurance agent that sells the products of typically only one company. Regulations put restrictions on insurance companies owning brokerage firms in order to avoid this conflict and protect the customer. In France for example, "exclusive brokers" must advertise that they only work with one insurance company. Those are delicate matters, esp. with as reputation can get hurt quickly on social networks. 

Thứ Năm, 29 tháng 12, 2016

Insurance and insurance companies make people scared

05:26 Posted by Unknown , , No comments
Insurance provides benefits for everyone, so why is everyone afraid of it.
I think ‘people’ fear insurance and insurance carrier because:

1.)    Someone they know had a loss that had an unfavorable outcome, in their opinion
2.)   The person buying the insurance policy is not sure what to buy and not sure of the insurance contract so they fear the insurance itself
3.)   Insurance carriers seem scary
4.)   Insurance is ‘expensive’ and you really don’t get anything for it
5.)   There are a lot of words in an insurance contract

The truth is insurance in a necessity in everyday life if you don’t want to be liable for every little thing that can go wrong.  Here are some reasons to find a really good insurance broker:
A.)  If you own or rent a home and a friend or relative comes over to hang out, but slips and falls they can sue you.  You would want Homeowners or Renters coverage for Liability Insurance and an Umbrella Policy for at least $1m to cover not only your assets, but to be represented in court and/or trial.  
B.)   That same policy would cover you in the event of a fire.
C.)   When you are driving your vehicle you need insurance coverage.  If someone hits you or you hit someone else you will need insurance.  The Umbrella Policy from example A will help you out here, as well.  

There are many, many more examples I could give (and bore you).  The bottom line is – an insurance policy is risk transfer i.e. you are transferring your risk to an insurance carrier.  As the buyer of the policy it is your duty to know what you are buying. Yes, you should have a broker or agent explain the policy to you, but you should also read the policy, as well. After you have a loss is NOT the time to start reading how your insurance works and what to do in the event of a loss.
 
There is nothing to fear with insurance or insurance carriers.  My advice is to save receipts, maintain pictures or videos of your possessions, read your policy(ies), know what to do or who to call in the event of a loss (auto or otherwise) and know what you are buying.  

Thứ Tư, 28 tháng 12, 2016

China rise peacefully, can or cann't?

If you want to have an answer on the topic, you have to know some information about the origin of the Chinese as follows:

More than 600 years ago (China's early Ming Dynasty), Zheng He led the world's mightiest fleet, with 300 ships and as many as 30,000 troops under his command. As we all known, the whole Ming dynasty (1368-1664) of China was the most powerful in the world during that period.
From 1405 to 1433, Zheng's fleet made seven epic voyages, reaching south-east Asia, the Middle East, and Africa, developing mutual trade, exchanging culture and technologies, communicating traffic on the sea and promoting social and economic development in such countries and areas. Without doubt, his achievements were extraordinary and a marvel of the time.
 
In his book Science and Civilisation in China, the British PhD. Joseph Needham, praised the Chinese navigators' ability to disregard past animosities and exhibit through definitive action a non-threatening approach to other cultures. Although the Chinese contingents were well armed, Needham wrote, they did not attempt to conquer foreign peoples or establish military fortresses on foreign soil.

Everyone in China is very familiar with the great stories of Zheng's seven expeditions to the "Western" or Indian Ocean (郑和七下西洋). He is an envoy of China's peace and friendship and the symbol of China's 'peaceful rise'.

Great Chinese statesman Deng Xiaoping, said China would never seek hegemony at the Special Session of the U.N. General Assembly in 1974. In China, there is such a widely recognized consensus that peaceful development is a strategic choice of the Chinese government.

Which county among America, Britain, Russia, Japan, France and Germany has said they will never seek hegemony in their era of prosperity?

Has the second country in Nuclear Club declared that at no time and under no circumstances will it be the first to use nuclear weapons in addition to China?


Somebody said Mearsheime is sponsored by CIA in the comments of the video in Youtube. I guess so.
I would like to say his theory has some assumptions, three exceptions and bold conclusions, which maybe are not right. Such as:
  • The most important assumption is China will definitely expand like American. But I knew China is still a paper tiger like he said, China has a lot of internal issues, which have not been solved. How could it expand?
  • The most unacceptable thing is he regards every big country close to China as an enemy of China, include Russia. There was a guy questioned him in the video, but he insisted it, his answer was it would be changed. The following is quoted from his paper:
    • “ Indeed, there is already considerable evidence that countries like India, Japan, and Russia, along with smaller powers like Singapore, South Korea, and Vietnam, are worried about China’s ascendancy and are beginning to look for ways to contain it. ”
I admired his comprehensive and logic analysis on China, include a good description of Confucianism and nationalism, he did not miss any important thing.
The most interesting thing is this guy is welcome in China and was nominated as a honorary professor in an important university, China Renmin University. It seems China government and Chinese scholars recognize the containment from America and pay high attention to it.
At last, we are lucky that America’s decisions are not made by geopolitics scientists, otherwise China will have to “rise not peacefully” before being attacked by America.
By the way, a few most-views answers do not have real thoughtful contents, they are just with beautiful packing, which is a pitiful and common phenomenon in QUORA. After read so many answers, I recommend Holger Nahm's answer to Can China rise peacefully? A less-views but meaningful answer from a western lady.
Attach the link of his paper. Can China Rise Peacefully? I read it while being accompanied by a lot of beauties, joke!

Thứ Hai, 26 tháng 12, 2016

The latest trends of insurance

06:56 Posted by Unknown , No comments
There are many trends in many fields, but " What is the latest trend?" is a very general question, and that many people dont know, the following is some information you need:
An insurance organization typically has 7 major functional areas :-
Sales, Underwriting, Claims, Risk Management, Rating, Investments & Re-insurance and Policy Administration.
The tremendous growth in technology reflects in the different functional areas in the insurance.
Sales - Earlier insurers relied on brokers to sell insurance policies. This was a big reason for the policies to have high prices. Once start-ups like Policy Bazaar came into the picture, it resulted in closing a lot of information gap enabling the customers to compare policies and choose the appropriate coverage. Selling insurance policies online is the biggest leap insurers have taken in this front
Underwriting - Insurers are coming up with newer ways to price/underwrite insurance policies. The usage based insurance in Auto Insurance aligns the customers’ driving behaviour with the policy prices. The insurers use a telematics device (with the customer’ permission) to track their driving behaviour based on which the premiums are priced.

In the Health Insurance space, insurers are offering discounts to customers if they let them track their exercise behaviour through the use of wearable technology that tracks activities.
Claims - Claims is a vast space for improvement and the insurers around the world have done well in terms of adopting technology wherever applicable.
Insurers are using drones for increased on-site assessment than physical assessment that would incur more costs. Elsewhere, insurers are cutting costs further by using an uber like video service for desktop assessment. The videos would be supplied by an Uber-like network of smartphone users and, eventually, also drone operators rather than a single drone thereby improving accuracy and reducing costs.
As we head towards a terminator/star trek kind of a world, some insurers have shown this by using Bitcoins and Blockchain technology in insurance. Blockchain (through Smart contracts) helps to reduce the claims cost drastically and automate the claims handling process thereby improving customer satisfaction too.
Further big data is acting as a crucial component in improving the entire claims process.
The insurers around the world have realised that insurance is no more an age old concept. With changing times, the insurers need to adapt too and they have taken baby steps towards this!

Thứ Năm, 22 tháng 12, 2016

The review of Times Global™ Insurance

09:36 Posted by Unknown , No comments
There are many good review of  Times Global™ Insurance, Here are some positive reviews:
" I accidentally dropped my iPhone in water and obviously the display wasn't working well thereafter. I made a call to times global insurance customer service and without any hassle I received a perfectly working iphone back within 3 days.
  • It's hassle free
  • 100% cashless
  • They do what they say
  • Very reliable and quick.
A few months later I started to again face issues with my touch. Without any hesitation I called them up again and yet again they stood by their commitment.
They have replaced my cell phone with another one which is perfectly fine.
I always recommend them to my friends. I also got the insurance for my mom and dad's cell phones from them!
They are actually doing a great job!" 

There are a few suggestions that: 
" Good company..Got timely claim as promised by the Times Global Policy Document.
  I have also added my laptop and ipad for Times Global Insurance coverage plan.
Got timely claim
Completely hassle free
No hidden fees or extra charges
100% cashless"

From the reviews above we can see Times Global™ Insurance brings many useful and good quality and we can believe to use it.